|
|
|

 |
|
|
I've had two honest votes as far back as I can remember - one from my present address (my present "present address" has been my den of iniquity for the past six years), the other from my permanent address, which hasn't for the past 20 years. And this time too my two votes came up against a wall.
That they broke their noses against a vertical structure meant to impede progress wasn't a matter of surprise: the wall's been turning us away from the straight and narrow democratic path since as far back as I can remember. What is a matter of considerable awe, on my part, is that in a country where to get more than one vote you need to have either vaseline on your cuticle or a colluder behind the inkpot, I should have been chosen by bureaucratic Providence to be gifted two entirely legal votes.
The statistical chances of this benediction? I asked a friend employed in one of those frenetically busy entrée-exit poll data gathering teams: he totted up and arrived at 670,000 to 1. Which made it 1,462.68 of us out here with more than one finger's worth each of up-yours prestidigitation capability.
But mere capability never won a war, internal to the self or external to the conscience. If any of my mutant friends realised that she was a twin - and had my unerring instinct towards electoral angst, as a bonus to me - she didn't cross my path. (All of us together could most likely have set up a political - or not so political - party of our own.). We extra-legal enfranchisees probably lay very mild spoors. Paralysed by Providence and far too much choice than that decreed by the Constitution, I think we waffle more than that decreed by the Constitution.
Not that provenance in this election, as in the previous ones, was a matter of joy, even the silly joy that accompanies a perfectly legal illegality. You've got to have something to choose, some measure of elasticity or boulder-holding capability between two brands of underwear. You can't have both falling around your patellae after the first wash.
But that's what the battle of the hustings came down to, at least where I am supposed to vote from. I'm in South Delhi, an arena as indicative, I suppose, of the electoral mood of the nation as, um, Cherrapunji. There is not much flex of pick between a Rightwing sloth and a former finance minister with a responsibility phobia as broad as his forehead.
It was an overlapping caste vs class act on a single stage, and in that it was different from the slugfests otherwhere. The former finance minister's erudition called, and the "intelligentsia" streamed in - all manner of pretenders to the intellectual chair, pledging to vote for the man, not the party. Eh? The handmaidens of honesty? There is a term made obsolete by the contemporary intelligentsia - the "class enemy". I think it ought to be revived: it's sorely needed.
It's was as disingenuous a drama as you could hope to get: the South Delhi "middle-class-and-upward" cast of extras wouldn't vote for Manmohan Singh because it supported the man, not the party; it wouldn't vote for the BJP because although it has nothing much against A B Vajpayee the man, it hates the party. Gimme reasons, I remember sobbing in frustration to myself in my head, better reasons! All I got was a resounding silence. Oh, bugger it.
So I did what I had done in the earlier elections, two votes and all. I let them go. I chose not to vote. If you think of a better alternative before the next elections next year, or have a split electoral personality, call me. There's two of me waiting to hear from you.
Kajal Basu is an author and futurist
|